| www.breastcancer-cured.com |
| Breast Cancer - Cured Women for Breast Cancer Truth |
Good evening to all of you, dear ladies, dear friends!
The majority of you, who are sitting in this auditorium, went through an ordeal that is among the most severe endurance tests in existence. Not only have you experienced a life threatening health crisis, you also found the strength and the courage to face it and to overcome it. You are survivors in the most important sense of the word, because you did not survive by chance, but by fighting and defeating your enemy at every step of the way. For this, permit me to express my profound respect and admiration.
detection and monitoring of the disease. The views I wish to express will sound extremely controversial. They will seem to fly in the face of what most people accept as normal, everyday reality. Yet, everything you will hear is supported by clinical data and scientific evidence.
mammograms, X rays, MRIs, and PETscans. By the time breast cancer shows up in such tests, the disease has reached quite an advanced stage, justifying, at least according to standard oncological practice, an aggressive, high-dose toxic treatment protocol. These diagnostic procedures, these tests used to detect malignancies, are invasive, occasionally quite painful, with varying degrees of potentially harmful results, and with varying levels of false positive/negative errors. At the same time, there exist other, approved and legal diagnostic methods that are safe, non-invasive, and 100% accurate. Yet, oncology refuses to use them. Let us take a closer look at these procedures.
the Reports on this website.)
modalities? As I said before, digital thermal imaging is capable of showing, safely and with 100% accuracy (no false positives or negatives) the early formulation of malignancies 10- 12 years before any of the standard methods can detect them. Please note, that we are not discussing a theoretical idea; thermal imaging for breast cancer patients is a service that is available at hundreds of private offices both in European countries, and in North America; it is legal, approved, safe and accurate. Yet, oncologists refuse to acknowledge it, and most breast cancer patients have never heard of it. What is the result of suppressing this knowledge, and excluding it from standard oncological practice?
therapeutic results can be achieved.
and fast. This will prevent the development of breast cancer into a life threatening condition. Second, thermal imaging can monitor the breast cancer treatment, until the cancer is completely gone. Third, it will prevent the recurrence of the cancer by detecting it at a level where it is only a tendency or a potential problem instead of an actual cellular corruption.
cause of grave therapeutic failures. Breast cancer is only detected at a level where the tumor, or its metabolic activity, can be visually observed. As a result, the diagnosis comes far too late for early intervention. There is nothing early in a breast cancer condition where one can see the tumor by standard methods. The second consequence of a crude monitoring technique is that it provides the patient with false assurance. The verdict, at the end of the treatment, "No sign of the cancer; you are clean" is based on inferior methods, and as such, it is entirely false. If the same patient would undergo a digital thermal imaging test, the cancer would clearly show up, and it would be obvious that a recurrence is only a matter of time. Finally, this practice condemns the patient to an ever present worry about a recurrence.
from the suppression of precise cancer monitoring methods.
survival period. Why did oncology find it necessary to come up with such a bizarre and meaningless concept? The answer is obvious. The long-term survival rate is so poor, that something had to be created to counterbalance the bad publicity. It is relatively easy to find statistical data about the 5-year survival rate among breast cancer patients. Try to find information on 10, 12, 15 year survival, and you will run into great difficulties. The data is well hidden, protected, and when you find it, distorted.
using the most precise technique available, it would be found that every single one of them still has cancer at an easily detectable level.
survival. This serves important public relation purposes, without intruding on the long- range financial benefits of the establishment. This is, where the concept of cutting off the breasts of women comes in as a "preventive measure".
body is respected, admired, and worshipped with an artistic and spiritual conviction. The casual sacrifice of women's breasts would be totally alien to me under any circumstances. When it is done to cover up a financial and political agenda, and when the cover-up is carried out with the knowledge and tacit approval of the medical community, the moral and professional implications are devastating.
cures cancer. It only suppresses it to a level where it becomes undetectable by standard methods. For reasons best known to the oncological profession, this fact is carefully hidden from the public view, and the monitoring technology that would uncover it is rigorously suppressed.
maximum dose of toxic drugs she can tolerate, she is usually told that although she is cancer free, it can come back at any moment. In order to prevent the recurrence, her breast must come off. The risk is too large to leave it in place. Her breast has become something hostile, a danger to her life, a potential aberration.
there are a number of non-toxic, powerful and benign treatments available that would completely take care of the remaining cancer. The oncologist will not use the monitoring procedure that would show him the real status of the disease, and will not consider a non- toxic potentiated protocol that would eliminate it. He will want to cut off the breast, because he knows both from experience, and from cancer statistics, that the disease has not been eliminated, and it will come back. However, removing the breast, and some other tissues, will slow down the re-emergence of the cancer, and the 5-year survival will become more of a possibility.
not an iota clinical evidence anywhere in the medical literature that single or double mastectomy has ever improved the long-term survival chances of breast cancer patients. It is a statistical trick, a public relation strategy, without the slightest scientific or therapeutic merit.
harmful, profit-driven protocol like mammography which, besides being unreliable and painful, is a potentially cancer causing procedure, but by digital thermal imaging. The method, if used on a large scale, would be inexpensive, and 100% accurate. As a result, breast malignancies would be caught at a microscopic level, and breast cancer, as a life threatening disease, would disappear. The tools for this to happen are available since decades, but the political will and the fundamental moral qualities necessary to implement it are sadly missing.
cancer. You have survived the treatment of breast cancer; you have survived your encounter with your oncologist. Congratulations.
questions, I will be glad to answer them.
|
|
| LECTURE 2 (excerpts) |